This has been a different year. First I will reveal that this has been a record setting year for audience to this website. Then however quite abruptly I received orders from God himself to begin restructuring and relocating. Yes indeed I'm a genuine seer and prophet and the visions and revelations here of late have been of such frequency and intensity of the likes that I haven't experienced since the days such saved America from the Clinton coup attempt which by the way created conditions and legal protections that are still quite active today despite the passage of time. So lately I have been quite preoccupied with the planning and implementation required for fulfilling my orders. This is the reason I give for my recent absence. He has not told me every reason why.
So in my curiosity as to the hidden whys I turned back to older revelations, many of which it has been some time since I discussed them. One that sticks out prominently is how eventually I will face almost daily attempts of assassination upon my person, sometimes under the conditions of being significantly out numbered. These are from visions I received and also it was spoken of in a prophecy from a beyond life experiences film I saw more than 30 years ago (more details can be found in the left column) which all say that these attempts will fail.
Like Samson in the midst of the Philistines. To date I have had a drone shine its targeting laser upon my person and twice a local Air Force Special Operations unit has flown aggressive air operations directly overhead. The message is clear and in direct fulfillment of prophecy showing to all just who and what they are. The devils, the anti-Christ and the beast steeped in rebellion against their Maker and his servant. So with nerves of steel and a stone faced resolve I stick to my purpose under conditions that would put others in the fetal position. Being a Messian I have talked with God however he never talks to Paulines so many of you will not understand this. I have seen the other side and I have no fear of it along with the certain knowledge of knowing that I am right. The prophecy says what it says but my desire is to fulfill the expectation of God and never to kill anyone.
So where might I go? Well the best way to say it now is I'll be anywhere and everywhere. One of the ideas I have considered is going to sea and for legal and security reasons, originating this message from international waters towards any nation that is convenient at the time instead of the current origin of from within the United States. Never the less I will never renounce my free born American citizenship because of the legal protections it affords, for now that is but I expect that eventually we'll all lose these protections about the same time. Another idea is I should relocate to 'gator territory. Ah yes the alligator! These would make excellent dragons for a moat would they not! And considering what the prophecy says they would perform the added benefit of cleaning up the debris and keep the armed night crawlers at a distance.
Never to forget this message of this website is the truth although I'll admit that sometimes my skill in delivering this message is lacking. Those who are Messian will have the thrill of being able to escape the terror of the beast but more important is the true message of God and his Son Jesus in that it is possible to have romantic love that lasts forever but you must believe in it and submit to his laws which, by the way, are never subject to the approval of man. Only male virgin can have female virgin or the madness and insanity of loss from which there is no escaping. So therefore I take great personal risk to save YOU from this insanity that would certainly come from ignorance of this vital message.
Yours truly,
Michael the Archangel
Merry Christmas!!
Sunday, December 16, 2012
Saturday, September 15, 2012
John 13: Mary Magdalene And The Last Supper.
![]() |
Adjust your monitor contrast/brightness for better view. |
This is the beginning of a two part series of posts that will open your eye's in unforeseen ways to the role Mary Magdalene played in the life of Jesus.
JN 13:21 After he had said this, Jesus was troubled in spirit and testified, "I tell you the truth, one of you is going to betray me."
JN 13:22 His disciples stared at one another, at a loss to know which of them he meant. [23] One of them, the disciple whom Jesus loved, was reclining next to him. [24] Simon Peter motioned to this disciple and said, "Ask him which one he means."
And who was the disciple leaning next to Jesus? I assure you that Jesus was not a sodomite! The disciple whom he loved was Mary Magdalene. Starting now and over my next few posts I'll show you this to be true. I also intend to prove that Mary Magdalene was the actual writer of the Gospel of John although not the actual Apostle John.
Yes Mary was there at the last supper and she was the actual one leaning on Jesus. Jesus loved her very much and she was a significant temptation for him but he had a stronger sense of duty to God. He full well remembered that the terms of his trial were of his own choosing and that he was selling his only chance for love, unused, to help those who had lost their chance to get a second chance of love. More details of this will be published here from time to time.
So Jesus remembering his duty pushes Mary away from him. Hurt, she leaves the last supper weeping as she goes.
The things of religion that I speak of in this blog are not new and actually were somewhat known in certain circles during the middle ages. Let us consider the evidence to support this statement in imagery, being the way of an artist, in Leonardo da Vinci's painting of The Last Supper which God describes as 'gifted'.
This painting is described as Jesus has just told his 12 Apostle's he will be betrayed although the imagery indicates this betrayal goes beyond Judas. Note that to the right of Jesus, being on his right is an important point being the preferential side of honor, is a woman who is called 'John'. This is Mary/John and she is leaning but on nothing.
The Apostle leaning over the table has a hand next to his back with a dagger blade where the thumb should be and since this blade pointed away from this dark faced apostle this tends to indicate a false accusation and some possibly counterfeit notes of da Vinci indicate this as Judas Iscariot. On the far right of Jesus the Apostle has somewhat of the appearance of a Knights Templar. Also notice the Apostle who has his hands raised in a gesture of appeal, peace and truth as if in a gesture to the thumb blade. These gestures also show the suspicion and who is it that would do this that was going about the room.
Now notice the divide and how it is between Jesus and Mary. This has a personal aspect and more importantly it has a sect aspect. Da Vinci is acknowledging the existence of two Christian factions yet the preferential side to his right is being distanced away so to say. To the right of Jesus in symbolism is Mary a gospel writer and symbol of eternal romantic love and the personal romantic tragedy of Jesus, and the dagger and Knight of Templar is a symbol of willingness to fight and use weapons in defense of the way of Jesus. This is the Messian faction and notice their general taken aback appearance upon the announcement of Jesus while this reaction is noticeably absent to his left.
Now notice the lighting in the room, a symbol of God, and how it is shining as if the source is on the front right of Jesus while darkness comes from his left. Also notice in the painting on the right of Jesus you see hands palm down, or to say right side up, and on his left you see hands palm up, or to say upside down, indicating the opposing nature of the two sides. Then notice on the upper far back wall, to the upper left of Jesus, you see a grotesque upside down face like that of a devil and is to be associated with the palms up.
You can also assume that since Jesus has just announced that he'll be betrayed that you'd think he'd be looking at his betrayer yet he isn't looking at anyone you see in the room. Their are thirteen people you see in the room and take away Jesus and Mary and you have eleven. One could say Judas Iscariot was not there or that he wasn't his betrayer but more than likely the ghost like face underneath the table to the far right of Jesus is used to indicate a hidden personality or as you would say a ghost writer is present.
Now the left of Jesus and without divide is symbolism of the nature of money and its persuasive nature over society. Immediately to the left of Jesus, who is looking slightly to his left, is a man who appears to be confronting him with his finger pointing up which is a symbol of seeking higher order. Either da Vinci is using this to show his personal choice of the left side and/or he intends to show this man as Judas the Betrayer and/or he is showing the left as thinking of themselves as superior but are actually lacking. People who think their moral values are superior to that of Jesus is an evil that is not rare.
Also notice the Apostle in scarlet and has a symbol in his hair that indicates persecution and imprisonment of Jesus. This apostle is in fine clothes as is the one next to him to indicate the influence of money on the church. Now notice the attire of Jesus and Mary which appears to be the same but backwards and can be used to say that opposites attract.
It is also interesting to note that the left arm of Jesus is covered with a cloak meaning that you don't see the real Jesus on his left but he does show his left hand meaning the left is the side that crucified him and/or it is a gesture of appeal to his left and/or he is showing their is no weapon. Notice that this cloak is black and white with much black and little white and no gray. While his right hand is concealed he does appear to be holding hands with Mary under the table which brings up another possible meaning for his open left hand in that he has no such affection for those on his left.
This is all part of a series so keep in touch and see even more startling events and Biblical evidence!
This all is told with the approval of God himself and his Son, Jesus. Find acceptance and protection in being Messianlovites Monogamy Blessed.
Thursday, August 30, 2012
G@ And O3S Software Technologies.
G@ and O3S are a combined language and operating system and it is significant. So much so that the development and construction needs of the future and also artificial intelligence of the scale that I envision would not be humanly possible. It is an unorthodox approach to computer operating fundamentals that is based entirely on my vision of what should be. It is a highly optimized approach to ultimate execution efficiency such as is desired for applications based on physics mathematical modeling, vCAD 3D, multimedia, and artificial intelligence yet is flexible enough to do any computing task desired.
I call O3S (Object Oriented Operating System) a generic operating system. This is a serious OS for people who want a system that is easy to learn, fast, reliable and that you can quickly become highly productive with. Actually intended for the Quanto processor being developed by Mescitadel Think Tank and is being considered for adapting to the the Intel x86_64 platform and a boot loader for O3S is already under development.
The human interface logic of O3S has been thoroughly re-engineered and this is most notable in O3Sf, the O3S fixed media (disk) file system. This constitutes an entirely new approach to the concept and arrangement and security of data files. However the typical FAT file system will be supported for removable media.
You might be surprised at just how unusual the O3S kernel actually is. At the heart of the kernel is a function I call the whirlpool. The time slice allocator. The backbone of this function is the view z order table. The purpose of this is to require every view/process to have some sort of view. However the main purpose of the concept is to create maximum efficiency in system task execution loading. Also an entirely new inter process communication system will be utilized and what this means is that applications will have no access what so ever to system call gates thus maximizing security in this vulnerable area. And furthermore improvements are being made in multiple core management.
I call O3S a mil-spec OS. Security is stringent and when used in conjunction with specialized Quanto hardware it will be better than what you can find anywhere else. In O3S every v/p is seen with some sort of view even if it is only a thumbnail. If some sort of spyware or such tries to become a hidden process then it will get no execution time. For any spyware or virusi to corrupt an O3S system would indeed be most difficult. The O3S shell takes unorthodox approaches to nearly every significant thing it does. For a successful invasion malware must not only corrupt the kernel but also every application on the system or it will be discovered.
The fact is O3S takes an entirely new approach to the concept of system registry. It is a simple system requiring all executables to have a passkey and yet properly organized so that copy and drop onto your fixed media (disk) is readily supported. No headaches and no confusion and no invasion. Setting the passkey is a simple process of loading the executable as a file into a special editor and setting the passkey.
Of course those of you exercised in vision and thought would readily see that this could cause stress to say the least in establishing and intra-net connection. Ah yes the intra-net, where the convenience of plug-ins and cookies are the antithesis of security and by the way, if you should try to track all of these every time you log on you would find yourself quickly overwhelmed. Public acceptance of a system such as O3S could indeed effect the evolution of the intra-net in a positive way yet what would we all do without the latest gripping excitement of a new virus hacking its way through the system I say tongue in cheek. A typical O3S system could easily do what people really want from the intra-net.
G@ (G Object Associations) is the language used in O3S and it supports @bject which is fundamentally a class/function in other languages. G@ also supports a unique version of polymorphism and also networks of @bjecti through the netw@rk keyword. This is a high level language but it also supports an assembler I call G@sm that can make use of labels and simple variable types. When desired their is also a lower level of programing I call G@ntel which is basicly a simplifying extension of the x86 opcode set. Development of the G@ language, universal document based editor and programming project system is virtually complete.
To be more precise in this subject of software programming the development of a functional concept is always the primary goal of the task and after this is done you code it in and doing this isn't so difficult. Thus the functional concept is how it works. However some significant priority readjustments are being made that could add some years before system completion. This time estimation is taking into allowance several other concurrent technology development projects being contemplated at Mescitadel Think Tank.
G@, O3S and O3i! are on the way to becoming the ultimate in computer science. They were created with a singular vision perfection and planning for greater things. The work on G@ and O3S are progressing well and as with all technology, it possesses accelerating progression. What this means is the more it progresses the faster it will progress more. Significant advances have been made that will accelerate the developmental time line of O3S.
This report is provided for information purposes only, as to the progress of development of critical operational technology of computer systems.
Quanto, @on, G@, @3S, O3Sf, @3i! and O3i! are the property of Mescitadel Think Tank and also claims O3S provided none can prove otherwise. What I mean is that the term O3S has been out their for some time but I know of none who actually have a functioning O3S.
Further definitions of artificial intelligence terms are as follows. O3i! (Object Oriented Operating Intelligence) is the primary artificial intelligence project of Mescitadel Think Tank and the software intelligence data base of a machine is often referred to as the 'id'. The term 'robot' is used to describe a distinctly non human machine with human intelligence such as R2D2 for example. The term 'droid' is used to describe a machine similar to man but still distinctly a machine such as C3PO for example. The term 'android' is used to describe a distinctly precise human replicate that cannot be determined to be non human without careful examination and an example of such would be science fiction's 'terminator'. Robots and droids are the primary interest of Mescitadel Think Tank.
I call O3S (Object Oriented Operating System) a generic operating system. This is a serious OS for people who want a system that is easy to learn, fast, reliable and that you can quickly become highly productive with. Actually intended for the Quanto processor being developed by Mescitadel Think Tank and is being considered for adapting to the the Intel x86_64 platform and a boot loader for O3S is already under development.
The human interface logic of O3S has been thoroughly re-engineered and this is most notable in O3Sf, the O3S fixed media (disk) file system. This constitutes an entirely new approach to the concept and arrangement and security of data files. However the typical FAT file system will be supported for removable media.
You might be surprised at just how unusual the O3S kernel actually is. At the heart of the kernel is a function I call the whirlpool. The time slice allocator. The backbone of this function is the view z order table. The purpose of this is to require every view/process to have some sort of view. However the main purpose of the concept is to create maximum efficiency in system task execution loading. Also an entirely new inter process communication system will be utilized and what this means is that applications will have no access what so ever to system call gates thus maximizing security in this vulnerable area. And furthermore improvements are being made in multiple core management.
I call O3S a mil-spec OS. Security is stringent and when used in conjunction with specialized Quanto hardware it will be better than what you can find anywhere else. In O3S every v/p is seen with some sort of view even if it is only a thumbnail. If some sort of spyware or such tries to become a hidden process then it will get no execution time. For any spyware or virusi to corrupt an O3S system would indeed be most difficult. The O3S shell takes unorthodox approaches to nearly every significant thing it does. For a successful invasion malware must not only corrupt the kernel but also every application on the system or it will be discovered.
The fact is O3S takes an entirely new approach to the concept of system registry. It is a simple system requiring all executables to have a passkey and yet properly organized so that copy and drop onto your fixed media (disk) is readily supported. No headaches and no confusion and no invasion. Setting the passkey is a simple process of loading the executable as a file into a special editor and setting the passkey.
Of course those of you exercised in vision and thought would readily see that this could cause stress to say the least in establishing and intra-net connection. Ah yes the intra-net, where the convenience of plug-ins and cookies are the antithesis of security and by the way, if you should try to track all of these every time you log on you would find yourself quickly overwhelmed. Public acceptance of a system such as O3S could indeed effect the evolution of the intra-net in a positive way yet what would we all do without the latest gripping excitement of a new virus hacking its way through the system I say tongue in cheek. A typical O3S system could easily do what people really want from the intra-net.
G@ (G Object Associations) is the language used in O3S and it supports @bject which is fundamentally a class/function in other languages. G@ also supports a unique version of polymorphism and also networks of @bjecti through the netw@rk keyword. This is a high level language but it also supports an assembler I call G@sm that can make use of labels and simple variable types. When desired their is also a lower level of programing I call G@ntel which is basicly a simplifying extension of the x86 opcode set. Development of the G@ language, universal document based editor and programming project system is virtually complete.
To be more precise in this subject of software programming the development of a functional concept is always the primary goal of the task and after this is done you code it in and doing this isn't so difficult. Thus the functional concept is how it works. However some significant priority readjustments are being made that could add some years before system completion. This time estimation is taking into allowance several other concurrent technology development projects being contemplated at Mescitadel Think Tank.
G@, O3S and O3i! are on the way to becoming the ultimate in computer science. They were created with a singular vision perfection and planning for greater things. The work on G@ and O3S are progressing well and as with all technology, it possesses accelerating progression. What this means is the more it progresses the faster it will progress more. Significant advances have been made that will accelerate the developmental time line of O3S.
This report is provided for information purposes only, as to the progress of development of critical operational technology of computer systems.
Quanto, @on, G@, @3S, O3Sf, @3i! and O3i! are the property of Mescitadel Think Tank and also claims O3S provided none can prove otherwise. What I mean is that the term O3S has been out their for some time but I know of none who actually have a functioning O3S.
Further definitions of artificial intelligence terms are as follows. O3i! (Object Oriented Operating Intelligence) is the primary artificial intelligence project of Mescitadel Think Tank and the software intelligence data base of a machine is often referred to as the 'id'. The term 'robot' is used to describe a distinctly non human machine with human intelligence such as R2D2 for example. The term 'droid' is used to describe a machine similar to man but still distinctly a machine such as C3PO for example. The term 'android' is used to describe a distinctly precise human replicate that cannot be determined to be non human without careful examination and an example of such would be science fiction's 'terminator'. Robots and droids are the primary interest of Mescitadel Think Tank.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)